The provided sources do not contain accessible or relevant information about the rational inattention model or its explanation of decision-making involving costly information about choices and states. Since the excerpts from econ.berkeley.edu, sciencedirect.com, and cambridge.org are either inaccessible or error pages, I must rely on established knowledge of the rational inattention model from economic theory and decision science.
Short answer: The rational inattention model explains decision-making as a process where individuals optimally choose how much costly information to acquire about uncertain states or choices, balancing the benefits of better-informed decisions against the cognitive or information-processing costs.
---
Understanding Rational Inattention
Rational inattention is a concept developed primarily in economics to address how decision-makers handle information when acquiring or processing it is costly or limited. Unlike classical models assuming perfect or costless information, rational inattention recognizes that people cannot or do not process all available data perfectly due to cognitive constraints or real-world costs such as time, effort, or financial expense.
The model, introduced by Christopher Sims in the early 2000s, formalizes this idea by incorporating information theory, specifically Shannon’s mutual information, into economic decision-making. Decision-makers face uncertainty about the state of the world or the payoff structure of choices and must decide how much attention or information to allocate to learning about these states. This allocation is chosen optimally, trading off the expected gains from better decisions against the costs of acquiring or processing additional information.
---
In the rational inattention framework, the decision-maker's problem is twofold: first, to decide how much and what kind of information to gather given that information processing incurs costs; second, to make a choice based on the imperfect, noisy information obtained.
Information costs are often mathematically represented as limits on the amount of information, measured in bits, that the agent can process about the underlying state. The agent’s strategy is to selectively focus attention on the most relevant signals or aspects of the state that improve expected payoff the most. This means less critical or less payoff-relevant information is ignored or processed less accurately.
For example, a consumer choosing among products with uncertain quality might not fully research all options, instead attending only to major product characteristics or price signals, because detailed information gathering is costly. The model predicts that as the cost of information decreases, decision-makers will acquire more precise information, leading to more optimal choices.
---
Applications and Implications in Economics and Beyond
The rational inattention model has been applied broadly in macroeconomics, finance, and behavioral economics to explain puzzles where agents appear not to respond instantly or fully to new information. For instance, in monetary policy, consumers or firms may respond sluggishly to interest rate changes because processing all relevant economic signals is costly, leading to gradual adjustment in consumption or investment.
In financial markets, investors may rationally ignore some noisy or complex data, focusing instead on key indicators, which explains observed patterns of underreaction or delayed price adjustments. Similarly, firms deciding on production or pricing may rationally ignore some market signals or competitor actions due to processing constraints.
This approach contrasts with models assuming full rationality and perfect information, providing a more realistic framework that accounts for bounded rationality and cognitive limits. It also bridges economics with information theory and psychology, enriching our understanding of decision-making under uncertainty.
---
Limitations and Extensions
While rational inattention models offer powerful insights, they rely on assumptions about how information costs are measured and how agents quantify the benefits of information. The model typically assumes a well-defined cost function related to information entropy or mutual information, which may not capture all real-world cognitive costs.
Moreover, empirical validation is challenging because measuring information acquisition costs or attentional constraints directly is difficult. Extensions of the model incorporate heterogeneous agents, dynamic settings, or alternative cost structures to better match observed behaviors.
---
Takeaway
Rational inattention provides a compelling framework for understanding how decision-makers optimally balance the benefits of acquiring information against the costs of processing it. By recognizing that attention and information are scarce resources, the model explains why people often make decisions based on partial or imperfect information. This insight reshapes economic theory and offers practical implications for policy design, marketing strategies, and understanding human behavior in complex environments.
---
While direct excerpts were unavailable, further authoritative information on rational inattention can be found on academic and economic research sites such as the National Bureau of Economic Research (nber.org), the American Economic Review, and educational resources from universities like MIT (mit.edu) or Stanford (stanford.edu), as well as authoritative summaries on sites like the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (plato.stanford.edu) or economics-focused platforms like VoxEU (voxeu.org).
